Yes — in Abhidhamma, a citta is not a “solid thing,” but a single moment of consciousness with distinct components that always arise together.
Let’s break it down clearly:
A citta (consciousness moment) is made up of:
The chief knowing function — the awareness of an object.
It’s like the “core” or “bare attention” that takes an object.
But citta never comes alone — it’s always accompanied by mental factors.
These are mental companions that arise together with citta and color its experience.
Abhidhamma lists 52 cetasikas, but each citta has a different combination.
✅ Universal Cetasikas (Always Present in Every Citta):
Mental Factor (Pali)
Function
Phassa (Contact)
Brings object + sense faculty + consciousness together
Vedanā (Feeling)
Experiences the object as pleasant, unpleasant, neutral
Saññā (Perception)
Recognizes, labels object
Cetanā (Volition)
Coordinates the mind, generates kamma
Ekaggatā (One-pointedness)
Focuses attention on the object
Jīvitindriya (Mental life faculty)
Maintains vitality of citta
Manasikāra (Attention)
Turns mind toward object
So at minimum, each citta = citta + 7 universal cetasikas.
🔄 Variable Cetasikas
On top of the universals, cittas may have:
Wholesome factors (faith, mindfulness, wisdom, compassion)
Unwholesome factors (greed, hatred, delusion, wrong view, envy)
Occasional neutrals (energy, decision, joy, etc.)
Thus, the quality of a citta (wholesome, unwholesome, functional) depends on which cetasikas arise with it.
Not strictly “part” of citta, but inseparable — every citta must have an object.
Without an object, no citta can arise.
So a citta is not a single indivisible “soul particle.”
It’s a package:
A moment of knowing (citta)
Its co-arising mental factors (cetasikas)
Knowing some object
And this whole package lasts for a very short moment (less than a billionth of a second according to commentaries), then conditions the next citta.
CITTA = [Core Knowing Function]
+ [Cetasikas (Feeling, Perception, Volition, etc.)]
+ [Takes an Object]
If any part is missing — e.g. no object, no cetanā, no contact — that citta cannot arise.
Would you like me to give you a table of the 89 types of citta (classified by wholesome/unwholesome, sense-sphere/fine-material/immaterial/supramundane) so you can see how these components vary?